Conventional Grades containing Niobium, Vanadium or Titanium
Conventional grades of austenitic stainless steels that intentionally contain elements including Niobium, Vanadium or Titanium should not be considered as optimum for use with hydrogen applications as these elements promote precipitation within the microstructure, adversely affecting ductility and toughness.
Furthermore, this would change the composition of the matrix locally in the vicinity of these precipitates, leading to impoverishment of certain critical elements which adversely affects the performance of these grades.
It is also clear that such conventional stainless steels would not possess a single-phase austenitic microstructure, conflicting with the preferred requirements set-out in ASME B31.12.
Challenges of Gaseous Hydrogen and Liquid Hydrogen Applications
Conventional austenitic stainless steels, which were never designed for hydrogen applications, do not possess a stable single-phase austenitic microstructure which is required for both higher-pressure gaseous and lower-pressure liquid hydrogen applications.
And considering the risks of mixing unsuitable grades of conventional austenitic stainless steels, it is understandable that End clients and Engineering Design Consultants require a total material solution to the various issues adversely affecting the selection and application of conventional austenitic stainless steels for both higher-pressure gaseous and lower-pressure liquid hydrogen applications.
This total material solution can be obtained by selecting the correct alloy from the N'GENIUS H2 SeriesTM.
Read more about the N'GENIUS H2 SeriesTM